Experts theorize over how to revive the industry
With the news that the federal government and the
Writing in the London Free Press, in the heart of the auto manufacturing area of southwestern Ontario, Norman de Bono suggests that Ontario may see smaller plants, more focused on research and development and therefore “better suited to the higher cost but higher quality and higher productivity” nature of the workforce there. He quotes two industry analysts who suggest the writing is on the wall for doing things the way they have always been done.
One is Tony Faria, business professor and automotive analyst at the
De Bono also quotes Carlos Gomes, Scotiabank economist and industry analyst, as predicting, “Any more facilities we get will be smaller, more technology driven.” De Bono notes the new Honda engine plant in
This argument for a scaled-down industry does not sit well with Jim Stanford, chief economist with the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW). He suggests the fault lies with governments’ failure to support the auto sector. De Bono quotes him as saying it is a “favourite knee-jerk reaction to blame union wages” for the present precarious state of the industry. Stanford argues that governments in other countries support their auto industries by tariff and non-tariff trade restrictions. De Bono also draws attention to the CAW argument that financial aid to the auto sector to help invest in retooling, research and development and job training has not been forthcoming in
De Bono notes that the auto sector now has 42,000 employees making vehicles and another 72,000 involved in car part manufacturing. What the number will be months or years from now remains to be seen, but it is unlikely that either the Ontario or the federal government can or will match the incentives provided by other jurisdictions, and it looks as if the CAW is not rushing to make significant concessions.